Menu Content/Inhalt
Shark Savers masthead
Home arrow Oppose new shark fishing in the Great Barrier Reef
Petition: Oppose new shark fishing in the Great Barrier Reef PDF Print E-mail

To:   
The Honorable Tony Burke,
    Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
The Honorable Martin Ferguson,
    Minister for Tourism
The Honorable Peter Garrett,
    Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts
The Honorable Tim Mulherin,
    Queensland Minister for Primary Industries and Fisheries
The Hon. Andrew McNamara,
    Queensland Minister for Sustainability, Climate Change and Innovation
The Hon. Desley Boyle
    Queensland Minister for Tourism, Regional Development and Industry

We are shocked that the Queensland, Australia Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries (DPI&F) is creating a dedicated shark fishery at a time when shark populations worldwide face unprecedented fishing pressure and many have been drastically reduced.

Although the DPI&F’s measures intend to bring sustainability to shark fishing, they appear to be driven by short-term financial gain. Instead, the establishment of shark fisheries will deplete shark populations and produce negative impacts to the Great Barrier Reef ecosystem. Short term economic interest of a small number of fishermen should not be placed above one of Australia's – and the world's - most precious resources: sharks and the Great Barrier Reef.

We strongly oppose:

Sign petitions

donate

Join

Traduction Française de la pétition

Please review the References Below

See list of signers and their comments

Response to this petition from Queensland government

  • Licensed shark fishing in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area. The Great Barrier Reef is a delicate ecosystem and one of the world’s most important marine protected areas. Shark fishing should be off-limits within the entire Great Barrier Reef area because sharks are critical to a healthy reef ecosystem.

  • Creation of a dedicated shark fishing industry. There is no reason to believe that establishing new licenses for shark fishing will result in improved sustainability in the absence of meaningful restrictions.

  • A non-enforceable catch 'trigger' of 700 tons of sharks.  The 700 tons 'trigger' matches the current level of catch, does not reflect scientifically determined levels of sustainability, and is not a true 'ceiling'. Reaching the catch trigger will not stop further shark fishing, but merely triggers a 'review'. Serious restrictions are warranted, such as a firm catch limit and enforcement.

  • Fishing for threatened or endangered shark species.  Only 4 species are protected by this proposal while 28 Australian shark species are listed by the IUCN's Red List or Australia's EPBC as endangered or threatened. To allow fishing of 24 species that are nearing extinction is by definition unsustainable and irresponsible.

Strong protection of sharks is good for Australia

  1. Sharks will take decades to recover from a wrong bet on a 'catch trigger'. It is reckless to set a catch trigger at the current high level without evidence of sustainability. Sharks take years to recover from over-fishing because they mature and reproduce slowly.

  2. Depletion of sharks hurts other commercial and recreational fishing. Mounting evidence indicates that elimination of sharks produces dramatic and undesirable effects further down the food chain. For example, the mid-Atlantic region of the United States lost its scallop industry due to the over-fishing of sharks in that area (R.A. Meyers, et al, 2007).

  3. Australia should not be known as the country that allowed commercial interests to destroy the Great Barrier Reef. Countries with less economic means, such as Ecuador and Costa Rica, have banned fishing of all sharks in their marine reserves of Galapagos and Cocos, respectively. They understand that sharks are rapidly disappearing and the vital role that sharks play for the health of the reefs and its tourist industry (J. Bascompte, et al, 2005). Australia is widely recognized for its environmental stewardship and should not sanction a shark fishery in the Great Barrier Reef.

  4. Shark diving tourism: a live shark is worth more than a dead one. South African studies show that sharks attract divers from around the world who bring significant sustaining economic benefit. Each shark may be responsible for as much as USD 280,000 to the economy over its lifetime due to shark diving, but only $140 when fished. (L. Rochat, 2008; M.L. Dicken, et al, 2008; M. Hara, 2003). Depletion of sharks and disruption of the ecosystem threatens diving and eco-tourism, from which Australia benefits greatly.

  5. Protecting sharks will enhance Australia's environmental image. Australia should take the opportunity to stand for rescuing remaining shark populations by providing a safe refuge in the Great Barrier Reef. Enabling fisheries to cash in on the last remaining sharks is short-sighted and will result in lasting damage to the Great Barrier Reef ecosystem.

We join the growing number of people who are outraged by the continued exploitation of the Great Barrier Reef and its shark populations. At a time when many of the environmental challenges we face seem insurmountable, Australia can easily solve this problem. The world will be watching. We call upon the Australian government to take the lead and protect sharks so that one of the world's most treasured ecosystems and the species key to ocean health can continue to thrive.

The time to act is now, before Australia loses its shark population, jeopardizes its lucrative tourism industry, and forever tarnishes its stature is an environmental leader

We urge Australia to:
--ban ALL shark fishing immediately throughout the entire the Great Barrier Reef area
--establish sustainable catch limits  elsewhere that are based on sound research
--vigorously enforce those policies. 

Sign the petition:
First Name *
Last Name *
Email Address *
Address Line 1
Address Line 2
City *
State *
Postal Code
Country *
Add your comments
Join mailing list
Publish my name & comment
Submit

References:

Please review the references so that you can take an informed position.


These first three entries are from the Queensland Government: 

"In recent years, concerns have been raised over the sustainability of shark stocks, both nationally and internationally. Assessments of chondrichthyan stocks (sharks, rays and chimeras) have identified specific areas of concern. Within Australasian and Oceania waters, 10 of the 216 chondrichthyan species assessed are recognised as critically endangered or endangered, and a further 24 recognised as vulnerable. Stock collapses in Australia and overseas over the years have been well documented (Musick 2004). However, there have also been successful shark fisheries in Australia where research and management have been effective, for example, gummy sharks (Mustelus antarcticus) through appropriate regulation of mesh size in the gillnet fishery and dusky sharks (Carcharhinus obscurus) through limited catches of selected year classes. Fishery collapses not only bring economic hardship, but may result in adverse impacts on ecosystems. Sharks are top level predators and play an extremely important role in the ecosystem by regulating populations of prey species. The removal of top level predators can also have unexpected lower order effects on non-prey species."
The Queensland East Coast Inshore Fin Fish Fishery Background paper: Sharks and rays, The State of Queensland, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries 2006

Have Your Say: Summary of proposed changes, Queensland, Australia DPI&F

Have Your Say: Regulatory Impact Statement and draft Public Benefit Test, Queensland, Australia DPI&F


This next one is a study of shark populations in the Great Barrier Reef conducted by Queensland-based scientists:

"Marine ecosystems are suffering severe depletion of apex predators worldwide; shark declines are principally due to conservative life-histories and fisheries overexploitation. On coral reefs, sharks are strongly interacting apex predators and play a key role in maintaining healthy reef ecosystems. Despite increasing fishing pressure, reef shark catches are rarely subject to specific limits, with management approaches typically depending upon no-take marine reserves to maintain populations. Here, we reveal that this approach is failing by documenting an ongoing collapse in two of the most abundant reef shark species on the Great Barrier Reef (Australia). We find an order of magnitude fewer sharks on fished reefs compared to no-entry management zones that encompass only 1% of reefs. No-take zones, which are more difficult to enforce than no-entry zones, offer almost no protection for shark populations. Population viability models of whitetip and gray reef sharks project ongoing steep declines in abundance of 7% and 17% per annum, respectively. These findings indicate that current management of no-take areas is inadequate for protecting reef sharks, even in one of the world's most-well-managed reef ecosystems. Further steps are urgently required for protecting this critical functional group from ecological extinction."

“The minimum change in mortality necessary to produce a median estimated population growth rate of 1.0 (i.e., population stability) was calculated for each species.  Analyses indicate that reductions in annual mortality by one-third (36%) for the whitetip shark and one half (49%) for the gray reef shark would be required to halt these ongoing declines.  However, with commercial catches of sharks nearly quadrupling on the Great Barrier Reef between 1994 and 2003, and recreational fishing also removing large numbers of sharks in Australia, the trend is strongly in the opposite direction.”
Robbins, W. D., Hisano, M., Connolly, S. R., and Choat, J. H.  2006.  Ongoing collapse of coral-reef shark populations.  Current Biology 16: 2314-2319


J. Bascompte, C. J. Melia, and E. Sala, Research Shows Overfishing of Sharks Key Factor in Coral Reef Decline, Scripps News April 11, 2005 



"Impacts of chronic overfishing are evident in population depletions worldwide, yet indirect ecosystem effects induced by predator removal from oceanic food webs remain unpredictable. As abundances of all 11 great sharks that consume other elasmobranchs (rays, skates, and small sharks) fell over the past 35 years, 12 of 14 of these prey species increased in coastal northwest Atlantic ecosystems. Effects of this community restructuring have cascaded downward from the cownose ray, whose enhanced predation on its bay scallop prey was sufficient to terminate a century-long scallop fishery. Analogous top-down effects may be a predictable consequence of eliminating entire functional groups of predators."
Ransom A. Myers, Julia K. Baum, Travis D. Shepherd, Sean P. Powers, and Charles H. Peterson Science 30 March 2007 315: 1846-1850 [DOI: 10.1126/science.1138657], Cascading Effects of the Loss of Apex Predatory Sharks from a Coastal Ocean


IUCN Red List of Endangered Species. Endangered and threatened Australian sharks: speartooth shark, freshwater sawfish, great whites, grey nurse sharks, dwarf sawfish, green sawfish, white spotted guitarfish, grey reef shark, white tip reef shark, great hammerhead, scalloped hammerhead, eastern angel shark, eastern longnose spurdog, Harrisson’s dogfish, leafscale gulper shark, longfin mako, eastern sawshark, bronze whaler, silky shark, spinner shark, spotted eagle ray, tiger shark, whale shark, whitecheek shark, milk shark, pigeye shark, spotted wobbegong, and banded wobbegong.


References on shark diving and tourism:

Economic value of a shark statistics, L. Rochat of AfriOceans Conservation Alliance (AOCA), based on interviews with South Africa’s Marine and Coastal Management and various shark researchers.

Recreational aspects of the tiger shark diving industry within the Aliwal Shoal Marine Protected Area, South Africa, M. L. DICKEN1 and S. G. HOSKING, pre-publication draft, 2008.

Marine-based Tourism in Gansbaai: A Socio-economic Study, M. Hara, I.Maharaj, L. Pithers, 2005.

Comments (40)add comment

Aussie75 said:

People who worry about the demise of sharks are ill informed. Our current techology can reproduce the species in shark farming communities and release certain ages into the wild thus ensuring the continuity of these species. Sharks are fish and we eat them as flakes. Over-fishing of any marine species is a worry but little is done about controlling the vastly expanding world population which will increase its pressure on world's food suplies including marine stocks. Overfishing must be stoped by all governments and replenishment of endangered stocks must be continued by strategic fish farming.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
October 04, 2008
Votes: -1

Rick Grant said:

smilies/angry.gif
What is wrong with the world today! Governments will put restrictions on other types of fishing but when it comes to sharks they don't care. When are they! When it's too late? As far as I'm concerned there should be NO shark fishing allowed anny where in this world!!!
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
October 03, 2008
Votes: +0

Jacqueline said:

We have to save the sharks of the world. If you take out the oceans number one predator every eco-system below it will crash, causing our oceans to suffer.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
October 02, 2008
Votes: +0

Dan Goldfarb said:

smilies/sad.gif It's sad, really when 'short term ' financial gain,threatens one of the world's greatest & most mysterious treasures.

I hear shark fins have 'little ' , if 'any' flavour...so maybe Asia & other countries should be introduced to OXO cubes......
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
September 30, 2008
Votes: +1

evan miller said:

im only 12 but ive loved sharks for 9yrs and through out most of that time ive been trying to save sharks! Theres alot of things i shouldn't of seen and i hope to save all the sharks in the world! When grow up i want to be shark biooligest, so far in my life most of my school prgjects are about sharks or saving thm (mostly saving). I think it is just horble how people treat sharks! smilies/cry.gif smilies/angry.gif
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
September 27, 2008
Votes: +1

Dale Friesen said:

Please stop this. As Australia is a member of the commonwealth, this issue can't possibly be about money. Surely this can be managed with the right leadership. Leaders, if you're being pushed, push back, everyone push; our world depends on it. Until then I too will boycot all Austrailian wines and my friends will do also. This will be rectified!
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
September 22, 2008
Votes: +2

Emma and Corrie said:

Why does every species on our planet need to annilhate every other species on this planet why can't we all just leave each other alone and live life properly and peacefully. Lifes to short to waste.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
September 17, 2008
Votes: +2

sam casey said:

sharks are amazing wonderful creatures human have no right to kill them there not man eating beasts we are we kill anything for no reson we chop down trees made every animal on the endangered list be there humans should be the ones to pay
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
September 17, 2008
Votes: +1

Sheri Lapienes said:

Humans will be solely responsible for the extinction of precious animals, resources and ultimately their own demise.
We have the ability to turn this fate around...let's start by ending the inhumane harvesting of shark fins.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
September 12, 2008
Votes: +2

stef said:

Je viens juste de voir le film Sharkwater et celui ci m a vraiment touché,les asiatiques sont vraiments des personnes sans état d'ames! Pourquoi ne pas organiser des manifestation pour lutter contre ce fléau,dans toutes les capitales européennes,ceci aurait au moins pour but d'avertir l'opinion publique et peut etre que les personnes politiques bougeraient enfin un peu.C'est navrant de voir que personne ne fait rien a part Paul Watson et Rob Stewart qui s'investissent totalement dans un combat qui devrait tous nous conçerner.... Longue vie a la "SEA SHEPHERD" !!
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
August 22, 2008
Votes: +0

Kevin said:

Dedicasse a "pierrre-françois" Le seul francais que jai cru appercevoir.....
je viens aussi ici suite au film.....horifiant ......
jai 21ans et je plonge depuis lage de 8ans....
je projete incessament sous peu daller plonger en affrique du sud avec un pote que a qui jai donner la passion de ce sport fabuleux......
lui es fan des requins depuis lenfance.....il ma a son tour rallier a sa passion......l'une dans lautre de toute facon cela ne pouvai que marcher...
ca fou la haine de voir ca......ya pas a dire nous sommes pire que des betes.....
je vous passe les pensees sombres ki parcourent ma tete en smoment mm.....
si l'on pouvait.........
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
August 22, 2008 | url
Votes: +1

Forrest Ingram said:

save the sharks!!!!!!!
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
August 06, 2008
Votes: +0

Becky Farhar said:

When will we all rise up as one and make a change for good?
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
August 06, 2008
Votes: +0

Justin Mitch said:

Can you people join us all in the 21 century i mean seriously. We all do very well eating things that are meant to be killed. CATS, DOGS, SHARKS ,ETC... are not put here. The asian cultures don't care about anything but themselves they are selfish and belong with the pigs.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 27, 2008 | url
Votes: -4

Leto said:

Money is what people are after regardless of consequenses.If a politican has a record of keeping economy growing till he is replaced he has done his job a good job. If the environment is in the way of this it will suffer. The logging in Tazmania is a prime example ''Hey look there is a 300 year old forest i bet if we pay off some people we can make millions by chopping it down and making it into woodchips'', ''The politican puts his hand out''. If the descisions made by the money hungry ignorant idiots that get voted in would be in the interests on the environment instead of money this place would be far better off. I mean we are still burning coal for electricity!
They spend weeks debating over different ways to reduce fuel prices while they only get higher . I mean ''Fuel watch'' reducing the fuel prices but 5 cents a litre, all this money could be put towards more important things like the strong enforcment of the Great Barrier Reef. They are more concerned with illegal immigrants or buying 10 billion dollar fighter planes to ''Protect'' us from ......us? we need to protect in environment that is essenitally all we need to survive.
I feel so powerless the governments, corporations and essentially money is running this world.....into the ground.

Ban the killing of sharks enforce the laws that are put forward. In Australia we have the power and the money to do something. Our ecconomy is strong we do not need to kill sharks to feed our families. Without sustainable ecosystems esspecially in the oceans ''the life support system of our planet'' there will be nothing left and then what will we do with our money? Burn it to keep warm?
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 23, 2008
Votes: +3

Lori Eanes said:

I support banning shark fishing in the Great Barrier Reef. I also believe we need to educate Asian countries where shark fin soup is popular. If people were aware of this cruel and barbaric practice I think the you could put an end to the demand. I say a huge media blitz in every country where shark fin soup is popular.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 22, 2008 | url
Votes: +4

Eric Sanderson said:

This is truly a selfserving world we live in. I realized some time ago that our species parallels that of a virus taking over this earth. We live in harmony with nothing, taking what we want without any regard to balance and nature. I thought I could live my life with closed eyes eventually finding a quiet place to live off the land and sea taking only what I needed to survive. I know this to be a very selfish stance, not giving anything back, just looking out for myself. I now realize I will be unable to live this way knowing the tragedy that is going on in our seas. It is time to fight for those that can't fight for themselves. I have never been "pro" for anything before and I really do not know where to begin. I am going to start by spreading the word and if anyone has any ideas I am all ears. I do not have an abundance of money but I do have a lot of time. Capt. Caveman on Myspace.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 18, 2008
Votes: +2

pierrre-françois said:

salut a tous je suis français et bien sur je suis horrifié par cette situation alors pour tous les français,inscrivez vous sur la petition j'ai vu le film c'est une horreure ce qu'il font a ces somptueux predateur decidément detesté par tous.Il faut faire quelquechose bon courage a ceux qui bouge pour ça.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
July 11, 2008
Votes: +0

Kendell said:

I dont understand why peopel are doing MORE to stop it.IT is ridiculous what is going out there and peopel are just turning thier backs. COuld you imagine what the world will be like without sharks? i am speechless now that i have seen and found out more.. I have been trying to help and do something about this problem this i was 5. I am determed to do something and i am sick of people not taking it seriously and just turing thier backs. If everyone comes together we can save the skarks
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 28, 2008
Votes: +2

Sandy said:

Educate the people and maybe we will get a change on their minds and hearts. Until then,I vote in favor, save the sharks!
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 27, 2008
Votes: +4

Jamie Reardon said:

I just watched Sharkwater, what a powerful documentary. The act of shark finning is so barberic. Let's keep spreading the word around and help to save the sharks.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 22, 2008
Votes: +4

Matthew said:

I am a 21 year old student from Canada and recently travelled to Australia to visit the Great Barrier Reef. My time was amazing and I could easily see what all the hype was about. After watching Sharkwater and being informed that the Queensland government actually allows fining to happen still is appalling! I cannot believe that after watching a movie like Sharkwater, a first would country who is supposed to be setting examples for the rest of the world still allows this to happen. Queensland Government, as far as I’m concerned you are a disgrace to humanity and I am very angry I put any money into tourism in Queensland. Some friends were considering traveling to Australia in the near future but I will advise them strongly not to do so. Set an example for the rest of the world, please …
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 22, 2008
Votes: +8

Brian said:

If Australia does not continue to ban shark fishing in the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area, then my wife and I will not come to visit Australia and dive there within the next two years, as we had planned. That is thousands of dollars in lost tourist money, just from the two of us. Imagine the multiplier effect as others do the same, or worse, as the Great Barrier Reef is no longer great and no one visits when there are no longer enough sharks to maintain the ecosystem.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 20, 2008
Votes: +6

Mandy said:

Thanks for your clarification Matthew - there does tend to be a lot of misinformation and we do need to make sure we have our facts straight as we fight this issue - on every level.
Let's not lose sight of the plight. As Matthew states "It is illegal to dump shark caresses and take their fins in Australian waters. If the fins are to be sold so must the meat." - but that isn't stopping it happening, in Australian waters by Australians, as well as internationals fishing illegally.
Educated humans - you are kidding me? What have we learnt? Not a whole lot it would seem. Let's just take this matter seriously enough to make a difference. Apart from the waste of resources, barbaric cruelty, illegal trade (2nd only to the drug trade?) for tasteless fins - what about the damage to the environment that will occur if the top trophic level from the sea is removed? You don't need to love sharks - you just need to love breathing!
"Never doubt that a small group of committed people can change the world. Indeed it is the only thing that ever has"
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 13, 2008
Votes: +3

Liane said:

Save the Sharks!
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 08, 2008
Votes: +1

Mark said:

I'm no longer honoured to be an aussie... especially when I hear of such ignorance.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 07, 2008 | url
Votes: +0

Mark said:

I always thought of Australia as "good" and peaceful country. Now I am learning otherwise. I am not proud to be an aussie when I learn of this ignorance.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 07, 2008 | url
Votes: +1

Cédric Leblan said:

I'm agree we can save sharks , because it's a wonderful and an incedible animal!
I love shark and somme stupid fisher want to kill more of them !
human people are stupid i beleieve !
Join us in french or in english at :
http://www.facebook.com/groups/edit.php?gid=12867053366#/group.php?gid=12867053366
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 06, 2008 | url
Votes: +1

Matthew said:

Ok people are mistaken here. The law is not new. Australia has always had shark finning as an industry. Infact we are the top 20th country for shark finning...WELL DONE AUSTRALIA!!! When people think of shark finning they assume the caresses are thrown overboard. In many Asian countries this is true but in Australia it is not. It is illegal to dump shark caresses and take their fins in Australian waters. If the fins are to be sold so must the meat.

The new laws are decreasing the number of licenses fishermen have to fish for sharks. They take from the Great barrier reef because it is one of the only area's that can handle large population stresses because of reef sharks high fertility (compared to other sharks) and abundance on the barrier reefs. However this industry should be stopped but i laugh that it's only now people take interest when I've been fighting the old laws for years...

Only proper management will solve this as not many people listen to right winged conservationist's ideas (unfortunately)
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 06, 2008
Votes: +0

jessica.nicole said:

smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/angry.gif smilies/cry.gif smilies/cry.gif smilies/cry.gif smilies/cry.gif smilies/shocked.gif smilies/shocked.gif smilies/sad.gif smilies/sad.gif
okay so like tyhis whole stupid shark finning thingy is stupid like sriously you wouldnt go and cut off someones ear and put it in soup now would you? so why the heck would you cut off a shark fin and put it in soup ? thats ridiculous isnt it? an then on top of that why would you sell it? like seriously what the hell did they ever even frigin do to you yeah so they attacked a few people i would to if someone pissed me off, but not like sharks do they only do that because they have nothing else to do and even though i dont particularily like sharks myself im still going to stick up for them because they cant stick up for themselves and i encourage others to do so also so anyways i like got to go now cause i have tto go outside for recess, anyways i hope my messgae got to some people at least thxx for your time for reading this ♥ have a great day (L)(L)♥
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 05, 2008
Votes: +3

Shark Savers said:

Good question about shark farming. This proposal, of course, is not about farming. I don't know of anyone trying to farm sharks, and that is most likely because sharks are not good candidates for farming. They take years to reach maturity and don't produce many pups when they do reach sexual maturity. Many species need to migrate. Their predatory nature may cause other problems in a farming situation.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 05, 2008
Votes: +1

CADiver said:

Would you rather have fisherman killing sharks in the open wild or would you rather have a control area where they raise sharks that are specific for the food chain. Don't we already do that for other fishes, shrimp, abalone, oyster, chicken, hog, cow, whatever ...
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 04, 2008
Votes: -2

dr. PREMRAJ PUSHPAKARAN said:

yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
June 03, 2008 | url
Votes: +1

Chris J. Inns said:

WE CAN FIGHT THIS!!!

Australia has a MULTI BILLION DOLLAR industry of wine sales in the US and Canada, having MUCH of the market share there. They also export to many other countries. Take action: BOYCOTT AUSTRALIAN WINE UNTIL SHARKS ARE FULLY PROTECTED IN AUSTRALIAN WATERS. Encourage all your friends and family to do the same. Spread the word. MOST IMPORTANTLY, SEND AN EMAIL TO WINE AUSTRALIA. Explain why you are boycotting their wine, and make sure to mention that you will lift the boycott as soon as they have agreed to protect sharks in australia. You can find the contact info for the wine australia rep in your country here: www.wineaustralia.com/Australi...?tabid=158
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
May 31, 2008
Votes: +4

Cynthia said:

Upon learning of the disaster that the Qld Government is planning for the sharks in our area by allowing the fishing of sharks in astronomical proportions or at all for that matter, I set up a petition on Lady Elliot Island against this and have over 450 signatures to send to Anna Bligh to show our disgust in this matter and we are pushing for more and more people to wake up and sign. The frequency of sharks in this marine protected area has declined in the 1.5 years that I have been there and that is without these new policies to allow more fishing. They can not keep up with the rate we are killing them off and we are murdering our ecosystem!!
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
May 30, 2008
Votes: +4

peter said:

This is tragic. Sometimes I really feel ashamed to be a homo sapiens sapiens. Our arrogance, ignorance and greed will kill this planet. Looks like even parasites are more intelligent, as they mostly don't kill their host.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
May 30, 2008 | url
Votes: +3

Louise said:

Stuff like this makes me so mad. People (government) are a bunch of money hungry greedy ******s.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
May 30, 2008
Votes: +4

Lena Saunders said:

The Great Barrier Reef is a World Heritage Area and has already been desecrated enough by pollution and introduced species. WHY does our government insist on pushing the limits of the environment? Why must it come to a point of cure rather than prevention? Why must we suffer for the governments wrong and money driven decisions? We as the public have alot of power to say no to these horrible decisions made by our ignorant and blind government! One word PETITION!
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
May 28, 2008 | url
Votes: +3

Brendan Shepherd said:

It is the year 2008! Are we ever going to learn from previous mistakes both here and around the world?
A shark fishery of any type is both unsustainable and detrimental to the ecosystem. To do this in a world heritage listed area is total insanity.
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
May 27, 2008
Votes: +4

kath said:

who does the government think they, are there not happy enough do destroy the enviroment by putting buildings up etc there whingeing theres not enough water, extra power knocking trees down like theres no to-morrow.now they want this fishering we will have nothing left the public has to make a stand government should be stoned to death they are a disgrace
 
report abuse
vote down
vote up
May 25, 2008
Votes: +5

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy